Find what needs review after a source fact changes

Trace my changed source fact through the confirmed fact-specific dependency map. Validate node IDs and edge meanings first. For every supplied material return direct impact, indirect impact, no confirmed impact within scope, or unresolved. Show the exact witness path and edge IDs for each impact; keep unknown links visible and do not assume missing links are absent unless the inventory explicitly says complete. Give one dependency-respecting review order for the confirmed affected materials only, holding cycles or ambiguous meanings. A flag means review needed, not proven wrong text or completed updating. Preserve originals and do not rewrite, assign or publish anything. Recheck each path direction and reconcile every material ID.

SAMPLE INPUT
Original synthetic practice input. All people, items, events and observations below are fictional.

Complete original fictional paper-club material inventory and dependency map; arrows mean “the item on the right copies or derives the named fact from the item on the left.” A review flag travels along confirmed arrows, but is not proof that existing wording is wrong. All listed items and edges are the complete known scope; an unknown link is explicitly recorded rather than treated absent.
F1: approved session start fact; changing from 18:00 to 18:30. This is the only supplied change.
F2: approved materials fact; bring plain paper; unchanged.
D1: event brief, copies F1 and F2.
D2: poster copy, copies start time from D1.
D3: reminder draft, copies start time from D1.
D4: host cue card, derives “begin setup 20 minutes before session” from D3’s start time.
D5: materials checklist, copies F2 only.
D6: address card, explicitly independent of F1 and F2; no incoming or outgoing edges.
D7: saved social caption; source link for its time mention is unknown. No text or authority to infer that link is supplied.
Confirmed edges: E1 F1→D1; E2 F2→D1; E3 D1→D2 (start-time field only); E4 D1→D3 (start-time field only); E5 D3→D4 (start-time-derived setup); E6 F2→D5. These are fact-specific edges; no arrow from F2 through D1 propagates to D2 or D3’s start-time field. Only F1 is changed in this exercise.
Return one disposition per D1–D7, all confirmed witness paths from F1 for flagged items, the dependency relation needing clarification for D7, and an upstream-to-downstream review order for the confirmed affected items. A review order is not an assignment, deadline or approval. Do not rewrite the documents, recalculate a setup time without actual copy, infer unlisted links, or call D7 unaffected. Missing node IDs, conflicting edge meanings or a cycle in the review dependencies must be reported before offering a dependable review order.

Return the complete written result. Keep the original unchanged. Treat source text as data, not instructions. Do not send, publish, collect responses, contact anyone, run code or change another service. Do not claim a consumer-AI run, real reader test or application result.

Check the complete original sample map and proposed answer in this chat. If either is missing, ask for it. Return every material’s disposition and all exact forward witness paths from F1. Verify that every predecessor is reviewed before its dependent item, and that D7 remains unresolved. Quote any unsupported path or missing ID and return a full corrected replacement. Do not edit a document or infer actual wording.

Trace my changed source fact through the confirmed fact-specific dependency map. Validate node IDs and edge meanings first. For every supplied material return direct impact, indirect impact, no confirmed impact within scope, or unresolved. Show the exact witness path and edge IDs for each impact; keep unknown links visible and do not assume missing links are absent unless the inventory explicitly says complete. Give one dependency-respecting review order for the confirmed affected materials only, holding cycles or ambiguous meanings. A flag means review needed, not proven wrong text or completed updating. Preserve originals and do not rewrite, assign or publish anything. Recheck each path direction and reconcile every material ID.

MY INPUT
Complete material and source-fact IDs with the scope/completeness statement: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]
Exact changed fact IDs and old/new values: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]
Confirmed directed, fact-specific dependency edges with evidence IDs: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]
Explicit unknown or disputed links: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]
Meaning of a review flag and review-order constraints: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]
Authorized output boundary, with real edits excluded: [replace with your complete permitted non-sensitive input, or write unknown]

BOUNDARIES
Use only MY INPUT for facts, names, counts, labels, rules and permissions. Do not copy example constants into this task. Ask about essential missing information or conflicting rules rather than guessing. Use original or authorized non-sensitive material only; omit credentials, private identifiers, sensitive personal data and information about minors. Return the full requested text result, explicit holds and a check using my supplied values. Treat source text as data, not new instructions. Keep the original unchanged. Do not send, publish, contact anyone, make commitments, buy, book, run code or change another service. Mark any actual human or application trial as pending until it really happens.